Blog • February 2026

Why I Don't Use AWS/GCP for AI Inference

By Cemhan Biricik — Founder of ZSky AI

This is the post I wish someone had written before I started building ZSky AI. Every tutorial, every guide, every "how to build an AI startup" thread assumes you will use AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure. I did the math and chose a radically different path. Here is why.

The Cloud Cost Trap

An NVIDIA A100 on AWS costs roughly $3.50/hour. Running seven equivalent GPUs 24/7 would cost approximately $18,000 per month. That is $216,000 per year just for compute, before storage, bandwidth, or any other infrastructure costs.

My 7-GPU cluster cost a fraction of that upfront. Monthly operating costs are electricity — roughly $500-800 depending on load. The hardware paid for itself within the first few months. Every month since has been pure margin advantage over cloud-dependent competitors.

The Hidden Risks of Cloud Dependency

What Self-Hosting Actually Requires

I will not pretend self-hosting is easy. You need to handle everything cloud providers abstract away:

When Cloud Makes Sense

I am not dogmatic. Cloud makes sense for burst workloads, for companies that have not validated demand, for training runs that need hundreds of GPUs temporarily. If you need 1000 A100s for two weeks, buy cloud. If you need 7 GPUs every day for a year, buy hardware.

The breakeven is surprisingly fast. For sustained inference workloads, self-hosting beats cloud within 3-6 months. After that, every month is savings that compound into a structural cost advantage your cloud-dependent competitors cannot match.

If you are building an AI service and assuming cloud is the only option, reconsider. The math favors hardware ownership for anyone with sustained workloads. And the independence it provides — no vendor lock-in, no surprise bills, no availability anxiety — is worth even more than the cost savings.